When you invest in a index fund — which has only recently become possible— from a risk management point of view, I agree that  it is better than picking individual companies.

If one or two of your picks collapse you can wipe out your profits for years. That is if you have say 10 main stock picks. Yet an index fund  still maintains some value  even in the worst markets by regularly inserting new companies and dropping the old non-performers.

When journalists or others talk about the long term upward performance of the stock market, they are looking at things like the “Dow Jones Industrial Index.” This does not measure the performance of the whole market, which does much worse– It is an index that regularly inserts promising “hot” new companies and drops the old non-performers.
If you go back to the original Dow Stock Indexes, I think that most of the original companies are long dead and buried, and had you invested in them, you would be nowhere near equaling the performance of the “adjusted” Dow.
So I think any thinking investor would have to agree that  “buy & hold” is not the best strategy these days — especially when you are talking about USA or European  “Blue Chip”  stocks in an economy that is growing less than the true unreported inflation rate.

The article about Buffet (below) has a lot of truth in it.

Why Warren Buffett Is No Longer a Value Investor

Can the last value investor out the door please turn off the lights?

Trust me, you’re it – Uncle Warren left the party a decade ago.

The Oracle of Omaha continues to put up the folksy “value investor” front. But if you comb through his annual shareholder letters and analyze his investments through the years, you’ll see he’s not really a value guy anymore.

Ever wonder how people get wealthy in America?

Most people think wealth is a result of good luck in the stock market. But nothing could be further from the truth. The reality is, most wealth is created by a three-step formula… the “Dominus Formula.”

In fact, nearly every fortune created in America in the last 200 years is a result of the “Dominus Formula.” If you want to get wealthy, please follow this link to find out how to put the “Dominus Formula” to work for you immediately…

When the Facts Changed, Warren Buffet Changed His Mind

As you know, the Oracle pays homage to Benjamin Graham’s pioneering work in demonstrating the virtues of value investing. “Buy cheap,” Graham implored readers in his revered Security Analysis.

Buffett took Graham’s advice one step further. He didn’t “just” search out bargains. Uncle Warren also figured out that if he bought the stocks of great companies, his returns would outsize a simple “buy cheap” approach.

Buffett’s early chairman’s letters showed his satisfaction with Berkshire’s investing patience. As far back as 1978, he expressed his optimism for Berkshire’s long-term equity holdings – obtained via its “buy and hold” value approach.

Later, his 1991 letter to shareholders took the value preaching a step further, waxing about Berkshire’s “Rip Van Winkle” approach to investing:

Our stay-put behavior reflects our view that the stock market serves as a relocation center at which money is moved from the active to the patient.

By the end of the decade, though, Buffett had grown frustrated with the lack of opportunities his patient, value-based approach was coming up with.

From Self-Content to Self-Loathing

The tenor of this changed permanently in 1999, when Buffett lambasted his own performance in his letter’s opening:

The numbers on the facing page show just how poor our 1999 record was. We had the worst absolute performance of my tenure and, compared with the S&P, the worst relative performance as well. Relative results are what concern us: Over time, bad relative numbers will produce unsatisfactory absolute results.

Even Inspector Clouseau could find last year’s guilty party: your chairman.

My grade for 1999 most assuredly is a D.

I think this was the moment Warren Buffett crossed his investing Rubicon. This was the moment he ditched pure value investing and became a contrarian.

From Value Handicap to Contrarian Advantage

One year later, he was still mulling the need for a new approach…

We see our equity portfolio as only mildly attractive. We own stocks of some excellent businesses, but most of our holdings are fully priced and are unlikely to deliver more than moderate returns in the future. We’re not alone in facing this problem.

Fast-forward three years to 2003 and he’s talking about his purchase of the euro! It was a trade that worked out great for him. It was also a far cry from buying and holding the likes of Coca-Cola and Geico.

At the depth of the Great Recession in 2008, Buffett made a fantastic contrarian macro call about the U.S. economy. He described himself as the “token Pollyanna” among a sea of bears and expressed confidence in the future of American business.

Notably absent from his spot-on macro call was discussion of valuations. Perhaps this is because the collective earnings of the S&P 500 were dipping into negative territory!

When his discounted cash flow models didn’t compute, Buffett turned contrary.

His recent calls have also been pretty prescient. In 2011, he wrote that U.S. housing would come back strong. He also slammed gold, which drew a lot of criticism. Both calls were a bit early, but if you’d followed them, you’d be well “in the money” in each trade today.

Warren Buffett chart 1

Warren Buffett chart 2

The “Warren Buffett” of Thailand Still Uses Value

Thai-focused hedge fund manager Doug Barnett has outperformed Buffett over the past 22 years by using a value-based approach. His secret? Easier competition.

“I compete with housewives and day-trading speculators,” Barnett explained at the 2012 Agora Financial Symposium in Vancouver. “Our portfolio’s price-to-earnings ratio is between 10.5 and 11, with 30% earnings growth.”

You read that correctly – 30%!

Barnett admits that he runs a much smaller fund than Buffett – so he can focus entirely on an inefficient market.

A value approach works in Thailand. It does not work in more efficient markets such as the U.S. When Buffett’s holdings grew too large to deploy in obscure markets, he dropped the value-based approach.

Try running an “old school” Benjamin Graham stock filter – you won’t come up with many domestic options! Perhaps today’s market is expensive, but even then, very few stocks over the past 15 years have met the old Ben Graham criteria. His strict value approach is a nice fundamental framework, but it’s not as good for making money in today’s more efficient market.

Instead, we need to do as Buffett does… not as he says.

We need to be contrarian?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>