January 26th, 2012 | Tags:

Negotium

As historical memory diminishes and the lessons of past centuries are forgotten, the practice of systematically destroying economic independence grows. Forget about real prosperity, the concept of interdependence, coined in popular parlances by the Trilateral Commission, has made the United States economy a post industrial dependency and a bankrupt debtor. The global corporatists despise protective tariffs because these excise taxes must be paid by foreign manufacturing enterprises. Since the rush to escape American shores, the transnational ventures seek not just cheap labor, but scheme to evade any effective regulations for the paradise of third world exploitation.

America’s economy was built under the shield of tariffs. The nation became the greatest industrial engine and traded profitably with the rest of the world, when reasonable excise and duties were charged on products entering this country. Just remember, the budgets of government were paid without an income tax under this system of tariffs. Who can logically argue that the deception of Free Trade benefits our population, when the current record of trade deficits continues unabated?

Tariffs for Survival or Profits for Multinationals provides evidence that tariffs are the best method to combat the deficiencies of the Free Trade ruse.

“There is nothing free about the loss of living wage jobs and the demise of independent production capacities. The notion that America is best served when multinational ‘stateless’ corporations are allowed to leave our shores and dump their foreign built products back upon the society that developed, financed and provided a ready market, is insane.”

The mumbo jumbo of corporate economists, employed by financial institutions is nothing more than jive by paid shills to defend an indefensible system. Use common sense. Any economy that is systemically stuck with mounting trade deficits is going broke. As long as the American marketplace has the desire to buy foreign made products and the money to pay for them, the game will last a little longer.

However, as a nation, the country is broke and the day when the dollar loses its reserve currency status is nearly upon us. Trading countries want to sell their goods to Americans. These countries will continue to do so even after adding a fair excise tax for the privilege of exporting their items to the largest market in the world.

Yes, the cost to consumers may rise, but the balance of deficits will fall dramatically and would push the buying power of the currency higher, which will allow for purchases in more valuable dollars. The other worthwhile consequence is that offshore manufacturers will want to build plants, create products and employ American workers here at home. The invigoration of domestic growth can and would develop when the labor force is able to get back to work.

The chart that shows world GDP when compared to trade under free trade agreements demonstrates that much of the world is not bound to the restrictions that favor globalist enterprises. Then ask why is it so important for the United States to have free trade agreements with other countries, which result in opening up our markets for dumping products that force out our own production and close domestic businesses?

The false argument that free trade and a cheap dollar foster American exports is one of the most destructive myths that the corporatists spin.

Domestic exports are a very low percentage of national output and even if the dollar was to lose, 90% of its international exchange rate value products will not be exported because the country is phasing out most manufactured goods. The notion that exporting our natural gas resources will help is extreme lunacy in an infinite asylum of national denial.

In the Varying Verity series the following, written ten years ago, remains true today.

“The method to adopt for restoring a viable domestic economy would require reforms that drastically lower, if not abolish, personal income taxation – be linked to the passage of Pro-Competitive ad valorem Tariffs in the form of a national import sales tax. We all share in the goal of smaller government, less regulation and free usage of our own money. We have a mutual interest in building a domestic economy that will create higher wage scales and more retained after tax income for the greatest number of our own population. When the best jobs become government work, our society is doomed and reduced to the median worldwide income levels.”

Surely, you must acknowledge that our country is desperately in need of a dramatic job growth strategy. Hopefully you will accept that private employment enterprises are preferable to public section government make work positions. Certainly you must see the sense in lowering the trade deficits that are bankrupting our economy. Need more proof?

Look at the steady rise in the trade deficit for the last two years. With a November 2011 trade deficit of -$47.8 Billion Dollars, just how much of our wealth and resources need to be transferred overseas to narrow this real world wealth destroyer? The answer is that the deficit curve will never turn down until rational protective tariffs are levied on imports.

How can America exist as a viable economy, when our money sinks in purchasing power and the country must import consumable goods, especially when we have no money to pay for the products?

Obviously going into further debt is no alternative if the economy is to survive. This current course guarantees a lower standard of living and a dismal future for your children.

Whenever the topic of establishing reasonable protective tariffs comes up, you hear the claim that the Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930 deepened the depression. Ian Fletcher in Protectionism Didn’t Cause the Great Depression debunks this misnomer.

“The Smoot-Hawley tariff was simply too small a policy change to have so large an effect as triggering a depression. For a start, it applied to only about one-third of America’s trade: about 1.3 percent of our GDP. One point three percent! America’s average tariff on goods subject to tariff went from 44.6 to 53.2 percent — not a very big jump at all. America’s tariffs were higher in almost every year from 1821 to 1914. Our tariffs went up in 1861, 1864, 1890, and 1922 without producing global depressions, and the great recessions of 1873 and 1893 spread worldwide without needing the help of any tariff increases.

If Smoot-Hawley had caused a global trade disaster, it would necessarily have been by triggering a sharp decline in American imports of goods subject to the increased tariff. Did this happen? The data say no.”

Do not be deceived by the globalists. Sensible tariffs are a solution. Trade deficits are the problem. Liberate yourself from the Free Trade agreements that only produce high unemployment and perpetual poverty.

James Hall – January 25, 2012

http://www.batr.org/negotium/012512.html

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • MisterWong
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
January 24th, 2012 | Tags:

A great article from Lexology.com

Duane Morris LLPEric SinrodUSA
January 18 2012

Are George Orwell’s fears of a governmental “Big Brother” from his novel 1984 coming true now? Well, let’s hope not, but read on.  

Recent press has reported on a particular government document: a Privacy Compliance Review issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security in late 2011. The document reveals that the DHS command center regularly monitors social-networking sites like Facebook and Twitter, popular sites like Hulu, controversial sites including WikiLeaks, and news and commentary sites like Drudge Report and The Huffington Post.

The Privacy Compliance Review notes that since mid-2010, DHS’ National Operations Center has implemented a “Social Networking/Media Capability.” This includes routine monitoring of “publicly available online forums, blogs, public websites and message boards,” according to news reports.

The motivation for the monitoring is to “collect information used in providing situational awareness and establishing a common operating picture,” the government document says.

But what does that mean?

Well, the Privacy Compliance Review states that the monitoring assists DHS and other agencies in managing responses to world events like the 2010 Haiti earthquake and border control for the 2010 Winter Olympics in Canada.

Websites subject to monitoring are “publicly available,” the DHS report states. The monitored information helps in terms of “situation awareness,” “more complete operating pictures,” and “more timely information for decision makers.”

The document also insists that DHS will not keep permanent copies of monitored Internet traffic; however, DHS notes that it can retain information for up to five years.

So, do you feel warm, cozy and safe right now? On the one hand, you may feel assured that DHS is trying to stay on top of its game with respect to “situational awareness.” You may also feel comforted that the traffic being monitored is “publicly available” and will not be maintained permanently by DHS.

On the other hand (and there always is another hand), you might be a little less happy to know that your online movements and communications on certain websites may be monitored by the government. Do you really know for sure how that information will be used? You may be concerned that something you say online could be misconstrued, potentially to your disadvantage vis-à-vis the government.

Perhaps there needs to be an even more open dialogue concerning the government’s monitoring of websites.

 

Source: http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=701f3890-aaa5-4195-8a27-4707b3401f24&

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • MisterWong
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
January 18th, 2012 | Tags:

All The World's Gold
From: Number Sleuth

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • MisterWong
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
January 18th, 2012 | Tags:
As you are aware, we now have our Dinar and Dirham medallions in place, which was the first building block for economic empowerment. It is now time to build the rest of our economic edifice on top of these. In the coming days, you will hear about several different programs that we are starting. Today, we will introduce the first one, which is our barter program.
A fact which both our friends in the American Open Currency initiative and the global Dinar movement have long realized, is that saving one’s assets in bullion, while a worthwhile objective on its own, is still very different from actually conducting trade in these. Our aim is not to just have people invest in metal, but to actually use it in barter. We want to have people to buy and sell things using these medallions. And so to encourage this, we are offering significant discounts in medallion sales to those people who show active participation in implementing trade.
The program will work as follows:
a) Anyone can register in our barter program by emailing us at info@dinarwakala.com.
b) Conditions for enrollment are:
i) Participant must offer at least one item of common use for sale against Dinars and Dirhams. “Common use” will be subjectively evaluated by Dinar Wakala.
ii) The item offered must be continuously available i.e. something that can be repeatedly supplied if demanded. One off sales of house-hold goods do not apply.
iii) Currently, only products will be considered, and not services.
iv) Pictures of products must be available, so they can be displayed on our marketplace website.
v) For buyers willing to pay shipping cost, shipping and delivery should also be offered.
vi) Be willing to accept all kinds of Dinars, Dirhams and other AOCS medallions of same composition as payment against these items.
vii) Item must be competitively priced (again something which Dinar Wakala will evaluate)
Hint: If you are not a supplier of products yourself, you can convince a friend or a shopkeeper, and obtain the program benefits for both of yourselves.
c) In return for becoming a registered seller accepting bullion barter, Dinar Wakala will offer the following incentives:
i) At least 50 cent discount per piece on Silver Dirhams, or “price matching” to any other silver coin from any other vendor in this denomination (3 grams).
ii) At least 5 Dollar discount on Gold Dinar, or “price matching” to any other gold coin from any other vendor in this denomination (4 grams or less)
The rationale behind this program is that the biggest hindrance to “sound money” usage in the community is the “chicken and egg” problem, i.e. does the egg come first to hatch a chicken, or the chicken come first to lay the egg. In other words, will people first buy the medallions so that sellers start accepting them, or will sellers start accepting them for people to buy them? It appears that neither of the two comes first, but both have to grow organically such that a critical mass is obtained which is self-sustaining. The aim of this program to artificially achieve this critical mass by offering incentives, which will eventually not be needed as the idea catches on.
We would also love to hear feedback from all of you regarding the sanity (or insanity :) of this program, so it can be further improved.
Thanks
Asif Shiraz
Dinar Wakala LLC
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • MisterWong
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
January 17th, 2012 | Tags:
This is our fifth year online!
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • MisterWong
  • Technorati
  • Twitter